Below is a summary for the article : Law needs to be reshaped as AI and robotics alter employment by Global Legal Post

*Note: Image used belongs to cheskyw

The report suggests that legislators should consider a ‘made by humans’ label on products to ensure consumer choice and a ‘human quota’ in the workplace for certain jobs as well as greater cross border co-operation.

‘Jobs at all levels in society presently undertaken by humans are at risk of being reassigned to robots or AI, and the legislation once in place to protect the rights of human workers may be no longer fit for purpose,’ explained Gerlind Wisskirchen, IBA GEI Vice Chair for Multinationals and co-ordinator of the report.

Titled ‘Artificial Intelligence and Robotics and Their Impact on the Workplace’ the study focuses on potential future trends of AI and the likely impact intelligent systems will have on the labour market, the structures of companies, employees’ working time, remuneration and the working environment.

In addition to illustrating the thread and importance of law in relation to these areas, the GEI report assesses the law at different points in the automation cycle – from the developmental stage, when computerisation of an industry begins, to what workers may experience as AI becomes more prevalent, through to issues of responsibility when things go wrong.

In contrast to the US, European laws prevent autonomous driving on public roads.

The report also examines the issue of liability when failure does occur, concluding that: ‘The liability issues may become an insurmountable obstacle to the introduction of fully automated driving.

‘ Currently, in most cases driver responsibility is assumed, with the manufacturer liable only for product defects, and vehicle owners subject to special owner’s liability, particularly in European countries.

If a vehicle is fully automated, with a human driver no longer actively steering, the question arises as to whether damage can still be attributed to the driver or the owner of the car, or whether only the manufacturer of the system can be held liable.

The report determined that international liability standards with clear rules are needed.

States as lawmakers will have to be bold in decision, determining what jobs should be performed exclusively by humans, for example: caring for babies; perhaps introducing human quotas in different sectors; taxing companies where machines are used; and maybe introducing a ‘made by humans’ label for consumer choice.


To read more information, visit the original article :
This summary has been auto generated by